Re: [mowbot] guidance

Monta Elkins (Monta nospam at vt.edu)
Fri, 27 Sep 1996 09:24:23 -0400

robin nospam at acm.org wrote:
>
> RWoodward nospam at gnn.com (Ron Woodward) wrote:
> As soon as it detects the
> absence of mowable (tall) grass it changes direction to go find some.

We wouldn't _have_ to detect grass height at all, necessarily.
MowBot would cover the entire area.

> Ideally, the boundaries of the mowable area should consist only
> of things that are in the environment anyway. There needs to be an
> additional mechanism for marking otherwise ``invisible'' boundaries in
> a Mowbot-friendly way, but on the princliple of maximal laziness,

There are obstacles that Mowbot must be able to deal with
to be useful (what I called priority 2)
Holes, ditches, Immovable objects

It must also recognize 'no-traverse' area's:
neighbors yard, garden, flower bed, steep bank.

----------------------------------------------------------
There is another 'map attribute' that I hadn't thought of
before.
'Traversal allowed - but no mowing'
These areas might be a gravel driveway that Mowbot could
traverse to get to other mowable areas, but should disable
mowing apparatus until it gets to the other side.
----------------------------------------------------------

Many of these 'map attributes' are impossible for Mowbot
to discover on its own. They depend on things like
land ownership, personal tolerances (how much 'buffer'
do *I* want between mowbot and my prize flowers/car/etc.)
and personal interpretation, (Those aren't "weeds",
they're "Herbs"... DON'T mow them!)

-- 
-Monta Elkins

--------------------------------------------------------- | "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is | | for good men to do nothing." -- Edmund Burke | | Monta nospam at bev.net ----------------- http://www.bev.net | | System Administrator - Blacksburg Electronic Village | ---------------------------------------------------------